Thirty students got the same assignment. Maybe four cared.
One core assignment, thirty different doors into it, zero extra grading. Same cognitive work, same difficulty, same rubric, wildly different relevance.
Yours forever. Delivered the second you pay.
The nursing major and the finance major wrote the same paper.
You assigned an argumentative research paper. It was a fine assignment. It was also visibly somebody else's assignment to about twenty-six of the people who had to write it.
You know personalization would fix it. You also know what personalization has always cost: thirty prompts to write, thirty rubrics to build, thirty different things to hold in your head at 10pm on a Sunday.
So you assign the generic version again, and you get back the papers you deserve.
Change the scenario. Keep everything else.
The trick is that personalization only touches the context. The task structure stays. The word count stays. The cognitive level stays. The learning objectives stay, all of them, unweakened.
A student tells you their major, what they actually spend time on, where they think they are headed, and one company or problem they already follow. That profile rewrites the scenario around them and leaves the assignment underneath it intact.
One rubric still grades all thirty versions, because the thing you are grading never changed. Your grading load does not multiply. It does not even move.
Four steps, about 45 minutes
- 1
Collect. Five profile questions in a Google Form during week one. Two minutes for the student.
- 2
Personalize. Run the first prompt once per student against your existing base assignment.
- 3
Unify. Run the second prompt once to build the single rubric that fairly grades every version.
- 4
Discuss. Run the third prompt to turn thirty different scenarios into a 50-minute class session students will actually talk in.
The fifth survey question is the one most teachers cut, and it is where the useful material is: what students wish professors took into account when designing work for them.
What is inside
Ten worked examples take one generic argumentative research paper and personalize it for ten different majors and career paths, so you can see exactly how much changes and how much does not.
The Five-Question Profile Survey
The input the whole engine runs on. Two minutes for the student, five minutes for you to scan, one spreadsheet out the other end.
Prompt 1: Personalize
Turns one base assignment into one student-specific version, holding the difficulty, the structure, and every learning objective in place.
Prompt 2: Unified Rubric
One fair rubric that applies across every version, which is the reason your grading time does not multiply by thirty.
Prompt 3: Discussion Plan
Turns the variety of student scenarios into a 50-minute session that uses the differences on purpose instead of hiding them.
Ten Worked Examples
The same generic research paper, personalized ten ways across majors and career paths, with the base version shown alongside.
The 45-Minute Workflow
From a boring assignment on your desk to thirty personalized versions in your LMS, in under an hour.
What this will not do
It will not lower your standards. If you were hoping personalization means easier, this does the opposite: the same difficulty is now harder to dodge, because the student cannot borrow a paper written for somebody else's scenario.
It will not survive a bad base assignment. The engine rewrites the context around your task. If the underlying task is busywork, you will get thirty personalized versions of busywork.
And it will not run itself every semester. Profiles change with each new cohort, which means one survey and one batch of prompts per term.
A five-question survey, three prompts, ten worked examples across majors, and a 45-minute workflow. Yours forever, and it works on every assignment you already teach.
Get the Assignment EngineSecure checkout through Stripe. You get it immediately after payment.
This is also included in the How To Teach With AI membership, along with every other system and tool I have built, for $40 a month.
See the membershipYou will assign something either way
In six weeks you will read thirty papers about a scenario twenty-six of them had no reason to care about, and you will wonder again why the writing is so flat.
Or you spend forty-five minutes once, and every student writes about something they already follow, using the exact skill you were trying to teach in the first place.
Pick the assignment students complain about most. That is the one this fixes fastest.
Get it for $47